Conflict of Interest Disclosure:Chair Gary Debus called the meeting to order at 1:39 PM and asked if any member had a
conflict of interest with items on the agenda, or in general regarding the
business of the LAC, which he or she needs to disclose.There were no such disclosures.
Meeting protocol:Chair Gary Debus announced the intention to both begin and
end CLAC meetings on time and asked members to be on time henceforth.
Introductions: Attendees introduced themselves.
ITEMS OF BUSINESS:Several items as enumerated on the agenda were discussed:
Legislator fundraising requests:Chris Pacetti reported that Ruth and Amy periodically
forward fundraising requests from various legislators.CLAC itself (and CAI) are unable to respond to these
requests and it is encouraged that if you live or office in a legislators
district and attend one of these fundraising functions, you will have to decide
for your self how much to donate.
Memo regarding CLAC Legislative
Protocols:
Ruth,
Amy and Chris presented a memo that Aponte and Busam had drafted outlining the
protocols and processes used by CLAC.They were seeking approval for this memo to be inserted into the RM
chapter newsletter.Chris indicated he
would coordinate it with the recent ‘what is CLAC’ article.There was some discussion and a unanimous
motion the insertion in the newsletter be approved.Chris also reminded everyone that although
CLAC is a committee of CAI national, we receive about ½ of our money from the
chapters and we need to be cognizant of that.
Presentation-Amicus brief-Fairway
Pines:Jerry Orten made a presentation and
frequently referenced a previously distributed handout dated October 19, 2009 requesting CLAC endorsement/participation in an
amicus brief in the case of Fairway Pines Estates.Jerry indicated that he would be seeking the
approval of CLAC and the two chapters to petition CAI national to file an amicus brief
in this case.He disclosed that CAI national charges a $500 processing
fee which may apply to this brief.There
was some question as to whether the $500 fee would be assessed.
Jerry
explained that the issues raised in the case had significant impact on other
CIC’s which was endorsed by other attorneys present.Jerry explained that he, Candyce Cavanaugh,
Jesse Witt and Brian Martin (HindmanSanchez) would prepare the brief and
authorization and/or endorsement of the amicus brief will also be sought from
the RockyMountain and Southern Colorado chapters.
A
motion unanimously passed to indicate CLAC’s authorization of filing of an
amicus brief and payment if necessary of the $500 processing fee from CLAC
funds.
Good Samaritan legislation-Rep
Acree:
A
meeting with Rep. Cindy Acree revealed that she is still interested in this
concept for the 2010 session.The
results of the meeting disclosed that this is a much more complex situation
than Rep. Acree first thought.Several
‘stakeholders’ attended the meeting along with Chris Pacetti and our
lobbyists.Duane Gall (Legislative Legal
Services), who is familiar with CCIOA, is the designated drafter and CLAC will
be given an opportunity for input to and review of the redrafted proposed bill.
Lobbyist report: This report was rendered by a
combination of Ruth, Amy and Chris.
Lender-Superlien issues:
Ruth and Amy
reported that a series of meetings had been occurring with Larry Castle (who
represents a large number of lenders), some lenders, their lobbyists and
individuals from the RE section of the Bar.Jerry Orten, Chris, Ruth, Amy and Jim Cowell had largely been representing CLAC
at these meetings.There appears to be a
desire by the lenders (primarily Larry Castle) to clarify a fair and accurate
depiction of the superlien.Some
participation and concerns was also reported from various individuals in the
Public Trustee sector.CLAC has been
assured that they will continue to have a ‘seat at the table’ for these
discussions.Jerry Orten made the
remainder of this presentation. The latest issues seem to surround the
questions and concepts relative to recording on the lenders side of the
transaction.One reported advantage to
these discussions is that members of the CO Bar Association seem to have gotten
a better understanding of the superlien and issues surrounding it.
The next
meeting of the group is anticipated on 11/5/09 with likely further answers and
developments to occur at that meeting.Some discussion and questions from CLAC occurred.
Construction defect legislation:
This issue
will arise again in the 2010 session.Senator
Morse and Homebuilders have both expressed interest in pursuing the issue.Ruth and Amy will continue to follow the
details.
Rep Andy Kerr:
Some
discussion had occurred with Rep. A. Kerr and it was determined that it would
unlikely that he would seek any changes in 2010 to his energy legislation.
Recession vegetable gardens:
A rumor that
had been heard by the lobbyists that some members of the current majority party
had concerns over some HOA’s not permitting owners to plant vegetable gardens
to combat recessionary effects was explored and does not seem to have merit.No further action appears to be necessary.
Senator M. Carroll concerns over
HOA collections:
Senator
Carroll seems to still have some concerns in the HOA arena.The lobbyists will continue to attempt to
define these.An envoy group had been
previously designated to work with Morgan Carroll on this issue; Steve Conklin,
Jim
Cowell,
Jerry Orten, and Chris Pacetti.
Representative C. Murray:
Representative
Murray has expressed some concern particularly over some older communities in
her district where infrastructure items (primarily older roads) are fully
deteriorated with no funds to repair these.Municipalities have been involved but have declined to assume the
task.There was some thought to forcing
these communities to become HOA’s.Much
discussion took place and more information will be sent electronically and if
individuals wish to join an envoy group the next meeting is 11/13/09.
Administrative portion- minutes, financials:
Minutes:It was announced that the minutes, as previously
electronically transmitted for the September
29, 2009 meeting were approved unanimously by E-vote and entered into the
record.
Financial reports:A revised budget for the year ending June 30, 2010 was presented by Lynn Jordan.Lynn explained that in this budget no
tax liability was reflected as none was anticipated.After brief discussion the motion to adopt
the revised budget for 2010 passed unanimously. No other financial reports were presented but
Lynn Jordan did verbally provide a balance for the cash account.
Meeting timeliness & process:Gary Debus announced again the intention to both start and
end the meetings on time and asked CLAC members to be considerate of this.Gary also announced that he would
attempt to send draft agendas to the executive committee for comment and
attempt to distribute the agendas to CLAC members about 1 week before the
meeting.Gary advised members to be on the alert
for Emails from his assistant, Rachel Campbell.
Next meeting:The date
and time for the next meeting was announced as Thursday, December 3, 2009 @ 1:30 PM at a Highlands Ranch location to
be announced.
Adjournment:There being no further business to come
before the committee, Gary Debus adjourned the meeting at 2:48 PM, November
3, 2009.
Respectfully submitted,
J. Kevin Moore, Secretary
CLAC MEMBER/DELEGATE ATTENDANCE RECORD:
Member/Meeting:
Oct
1.16.09
2.20.09
3.20.09
7.28.09
9.29.09
11.3.09
12.3.09
Bobb, Andrea
na
X
X
X
X
Cowell, Jim
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Debus, Gary
X
X
X
X
X
X
DeLisio, Carmine
X
X
X
X
X
Foley-Healy, Molly
X
X
X
X
X
Goff, Pam
X
X
Graf, David
X
X
X
X
Exc
X
Hoehn, Robert
X
X
X
X
Exc
X
Exc
Jordan, Lynn
X
X
X
X
X
X
Karpuk, Deb
X
X
X
Exc
X
Krohlow, Kent
X
X
Exc
Kutzer, Jeff
X
X
Leff, Suzanne
X
X
X
X
X
X
Lukasik, Walt
na
X
X
Exc
X
McIntyre, Jason
X
X
Moore, Kevin
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Orten, Jerry
X
X
X
X
X
X
Pacetti, Chris
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Tobey, Gary
X
X
X
X
X
X
Wilderotter, Pat
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Witt, Jesse
X
X
X
X
X
Attendance
Policy:
A LAC delegate
who has three consecutive unexcused absences (as determined by the LAC’s
officers) from LAC meetings may be removed by a majority vote of the LAC at a
meeting where a quorum is present provided the LAC chair notified the delegate
and his or her chapter, if applicable, in writing following the delegates
second unexcused absence that a third consecutive absence may result in the
delegate’s removal.